STEP ONE: Read Dirk Perrefort's July 9 2010 article on Mark Boughton's deposition in the Danbury 11 case.
STEP TWO: Read New Haven Register Mary O'Leary's July 21 article on Mark Boughton's deposition.
Now that you see the startling differences between the two articles...
STEP THREE: Read Perrefort's September 19th article on Boughton's deposition.
Why is there a vast difference between Perrefort's two articles since they are based on the exact same thing: Boughton's deposition. Better yet, isn't it ironic that Perrefort's second stab at Boughton's deposition almost mirrors New Haven Register reporter O'Leary's piece from July?
Given that this is the same person who has yet to report on the embarrassing details regarding the city's admittance of wrongdoing in the 450,000 dollar firefighter settlement, maybe the editors at the News-Times should have a talk with their "political" reporter.
...I miss Eugene.
No comments:
Post a Comment