.:[Double Click To][Close]:.
Get paid To Promote 
at any Location





Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Lil' Kim's latest act of war..er..provocation..er..hissy fit for attention..war crime

Absolutely amazing that this lil' bit of moral jetsam is allowed to get away with this, time and again.

And some more from Lil' Kim's 'hit' parade:

Jan 1967 - attacks South Korean warship near border, killing 39 sailors
Jan 1968 - commandos storm presidential palace in Seoul in a failed attempt to kill President Park Chung-hee
Jan 1968 - captures USS Pueblo - one crew member dies and 82 held hostage for 11 months
Dec 1969 - hijacks South Korean airliner taking dozens of passengers hostage
Oct 1983 - bombs hotel in Rangoon, Burma in failed attempt to kill South Korean President Chun Doo-hwan - 21 people die
Nov 1987 - bombs South Korean airliner, killing 115
Sept 1996 - sub carrying 26 troops disabled off South - some land in South sparking deadly manhunt
Mar 2010 - torpedoes Cheonan warship, 46 sailors killed


If I were in charge, down south of the DMZ, I'd be doing something about this. The lil' sumbitch is killing South Koreans with impunity.

I'd strike at one Mr. Ronery's Nuke facilities, or better yet, the on site residences of the people that administer those barbaric gulags so appalling, described here.

Alternatively, or perhaps additionally, I'd hit Lil' Kim where it hurts, quite literally at home, with a decapitating precision strike. With a little luck, the strike would also remove Lil lil Kim, heir apparent, from this mortal coil in the process. That would precipitate an internal political crises.

Prefatory to these moves, I'd get my friends in the U.S. to assure the Nokos that they had better not contemplate a retaliation, because it would not turn out good for them. U.S. Navy would make an appearance in nearby waters.

Surely there are folks in the Noko military, or government that would prefer to bring their country out of the Stalinist dark ages. No doubt a sizable portion of the general population would welcome this.

Heck, even if regime change ain't in the offing, internal instability would avert attention from provoking neighbors. Would the chicoms move to prop the teetering regime in the scenario as I have described it? I don't think so.

No comments:

Post a Comment